RecruitScreen

Candidate data residency: what Australian recruiters need to know in 2026

2 July 2026 · RecruitScreen

Every recruiter now runs on software, and most of that software is American. For a lot of tooling that’s a non-issue. Candidate screening is different: a video interview is a person’s face, voice, full name and work history in a single file, collected from someone who trusts you with it because they want a job. It’s about as personal as personal information gets — and where it’s stored is a question your clients, candidates and auditors are increasingly asking.

This is general information, not legal advice — but here’s the landscape and the questions worth asking any vendor, including us.

The short version of your obligations

The Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) and the Australian Privacy Principles govern how organisations handle personal information. Two pieces matter most for screening:

APP 8 (cross-border disclosure). When you disclose personal information to an overseas recipient, you generally remain accountable for what they do with it. Using a US-hosted screening platform doesn’t transfer your responsibility — it extends it to infrastructure you can’t see, under a legal system your candidates didn’t choose.

APP 11 (security and retention). You must take reasonable steps to protect personal information and to destroy or de-identify it when no longer needed. Screening recordings of rejected candidates sitting in a foreign data centre for years is exactly the pattern this principle exists to prevent.

None of this makes offshore platforms illegal. It makes them a compliance question you have to own and answer — in vendor reviews, client due-diligence questionnaires, and the uncomfortable email after a breach notification.

The questions to ask any screening vendor

Where exactly is candidate data stored, and is it replicated to other regions? What is the retention period, and is deletion automatic or manual? Are recordings used to train AI models? Who can access recordings on the vendor side? What happens to data when your account closes? A vendor with good answers will give them in writing without friction. A vendor with vague answers has answered anyway.

Why we built RecruitScreen onshore

RecruitScreen stores candidate recordings and personal information in Sydney — not “primarily”, not “by request on enterprise plans” — as the default and only behaviour. Recordings auto-delete within 12 months of a campaign closing, sooner when candidates withdraw. Recordings are never used to train AI. Billing is in AUD on an Australian ABN, which means your privacy posture and your procurement paperwork agree with each other.

For agencies, this is more than compliance hygiene: “candidate data stays in Sydney and auto-deletes” is a line that wins client tenders. The full picture is on the why Australian page, and you can see how the comparisons stack up against Willo, Hireflix and others.

Start a free trial — and ask us the vendor questions above; we like answering them.

FAQ

Is a candidate video interview "personal information" under the Privacy Act? +

Clearly yes — it contains a person’s face, voice, name and employment history. Treat recordings with at least the care you give CVs, and arguably more.

Does APP 8 prohibit using overseas platforms? +

No — it makes you accountable for what happens to personal information you disclose overseas. Many organisations decide the simpler compliance position is keeping candidate data onshore.