Honest comparisons
Every platform here is a real product with real strengths. These pages tell you where each one wins, where RecruitScreen wins, and which fits an Australian team — without a fake feature grid in sight.
RecruitScreen vs Willo
Comparing Willo and RecruitScreen for async video screening? Willo is UK-based and hosts candidate data in the EU and US; RecruitScreen stores candidate video in Sydney with automatic deletion at 12 months. Honest comparison.
Read the comparison →RecruitScreen vs Hireflix
Hireflix vs RecruitScreen for one-way video interviews: both prize simplicity and neither scores candidates with AI. The differences are data residency, a published deletion schedule, and monthly AUD billing.
Read the comparison →RecruitScreen vs Spark Hire
Spark Hire vs RecruitScreen: Spark Hire is a broad US video-interview suite that auto-scores responses and publishes "starting at" USD pricing. RecruitScreen is the focused Australian option with Sydney data residency and human review.
Read the comparison →RecruitScreen vs myInterview
myInterview is now part of Radancy: the standalone site and pricing page are gone, and scoring surfaces top matches automatically. RecruitScreen is a transparent, Australian-owned alternative with published AUD pricing.
Read the comparison →Phone screening vs video screening
Phone screens take 15–30 minutes each, suffer no-shows and leave no record. Async video screening runs in bulk with comparable, reviewable answers. When each wins, honestly.
Read the comparison →